December 31, 2009

Review: Parade of works in progress at the Cloud Dance Festival

Cloud Dance Festival: Parade
5 & 6 December 2009
People Show Studios, London

So how many festivals actually survive without funding, presenting creations year after year? Cloud Dance Festival has been doing it thrice-yearly since 2007, and proudly introduced its Parade edition in December. Three performances over a weekend featured both favourite artists and newcomers, and although the People Show Studios proved quite small, seeing the performers up close is a privilege often denied in larger venues. The genius of Cloud Dance Festival also lies in its selection of short pieces, some of them works in process – you may not like something, but there are always 7 very different companies to discover, often introducing fresh new works.

Saturday’s performance started with FLEXA Dance Theatre and an intriguing work title, Festival and nagune (wayfarer). Ji Park is adept at using the individuality of her two performers – Aurore Marie’s odd grace and Adrian White’s stillness shine through in the best moments of Festival and nagune, and she literally floats in his arms towards the end, but the work doesn’t quite cohere as a whole. Some elements bear little relation to the rest – the dancers are seen shrieking and running, an Edith Piaf song makes an appearance, and bits of dialogue come and go. The books used as props, first neatly divided into piles, then scattered, provide a compelling image of the performers’ mental landscape, but despite the clever ending, the work does feel at times impenetrable.

Hyanglae Jin‘s Life in the womb, on the contrary, is a fully realised organic form, imbued with the strangeness of a Hong Kong film. The fascinatingly alien face of the choreographer and dancer lingers in the mind as she stretches into and retracts from the unknown, breathing with her musician (Revital Snir) – street noises fade in and out like a glimpse of the world outside the womb, heavily reminiscent of Marguerite Duras’s L’Amant and its strangely preserved, sweaty atmosphere. Hyanglae Jin looks like she was just born and yet knows more about this world than any of us do as she stands in the end – an Outsider, utterly magnetic.

Extensions and Rooms, following an interval, is similarly the work of a highly individual performer. Petra Söör is a presence so natural and human on the stage that she never looks like she is performing – a soft, beautiful experience for the audience, and her choreography matches her qualities exactly. Extensions and Rooms is a reflection on the way we make new environments our own, and Petra Söör goes from atmosphere to atmosphere, changing dynamics, moving from the corners to a potentially hostile center. She explores each of them in a low-key, simple manner, but her eyes and light, hesitating hands create the limits of the world better than emphatic choreography, until she leaves the premises, switching off the lights herself.

Leaf Dance‘s Papillon is a lesson in not quoting Rainer Maria Rilke in a programme if you’re not making poetry out of your every movement. Leyla Rees, the choreographer, has brought together a very talented group of four performers, but the “butterfly” evoked in the title is not reflected in the movement itself, which is by and large generic. The “exploration of inner hope” doesn’t quite come to life, possibly because the response to the music is still very muted in Rees’ work – more precision, more accents and personality would allow Papillon to go beyond the charming butterfly make-up to a true, individual language.

This part of the evening alone showed the diversity of the festival, with Slanjayvah Danza‘s sensual Blind Passion following the very different Extensions and Papillon. Jenni Wren is a master of contact work, and her blindfolded, almost entirely naked duo with Phil Sanger is breathtakingly vulnerable. The blindfolds bring a hesitation to their movements that makes their mutual trust and physical daring all the more fascinating – probably the most entrancing act of seduction and union to be seen in dance at the moment. It is a true shame that the Argentine tango inserted in the first part doesn’t match the rest of the work, despite the apt choice of a Gotan Project slow track – born of improvisation, this dance is very difficult to choreograph, and both dancers need more experience in the style to make it the sinuous, feline, fluid vision that it should be.

A second interval brought us two intense works to close the Saturday evening show. Pair Dance’s RUSH is again a complete change of style, pushing physicality to the fore – exploring the madness and chaos of commuter life, represented by the seats lined up at the back, the work is carried by the sheer energy of its performers and Richard Leonard’s intense soundtrack. The dancers don’t hold back, acting out frustration in an outpouring of movement both drastically accentuated and thoroughly effective, although overall the work could use more contrast. Harriet Macauley’s choreography goes for broke, and the dancers match it all the way, leaving the audience stunned.

Finally, the winner of The Place Prize 2008’s audience prize, Dam Van Huynh, took centre stage to send the audience home with an excerpt from Sudden Change of Event. Certainly one of the most professional offerings in terms of costumes and props, it is an absorbing take on chance and possibilities in choreography, as its randomness never looks chaotic. Disruption, changes of direction – it is a world that leaves one uneasy, all the while unfolding seamlessly. The company’s dancers bring clarity, fluidity and rhythm to the piece, performed in silence, and it would be interesting to see what the full work, premiered in November, makes of this almost austere section.

***

Sunday’s performance had an altogether different feel to it, with two “narrative” works to kick off the evening. Diciembre Dance Group, a young company formed by Lucía Piquero, aimed very high with its first creation, The House of Bernarda Alba. It is encouraging to see young choreographers still taking inspiration from literature, and Mats Ek already proved that Federico García Lorca’s play was well worth exploring in terms of movement. Lucía Piquero actually tried to go back to the original instructions of the play, and uses a cast of seven women to represent Bernarda, her daughters and the servant. Her style is lighter than Mats Ek’s, inspired by the dancers’ ballet training, but the mantillas, fans and religious postures bring the right note of obsession and ritual to the actual dancing. Giving a sense of the play’s heavy symbolism in such a short time is a feat in itself, and Piquero uses her best dancers to the utmost, giving them short solos that highlight their individual dynamics. The piece could however be tighter and the ensemble parts more precise and powerful – steps were routinely blurred, but it is a promising start for the young Spanish dancer and choreographer.

Sophia Hurdley‘s Callas, on the other hand, is an absolutely unique work, quite unlike anything else performed that weekend. Based on the love story between Maria Callas and Aristotle Onassis while he was married to Jackie Kennedy, it uses R.J Murrow’s voice and black and white film footage to give the audience a welcome sense of the context. Its blend of dance, music and drama is just superb, and Callas features great performers, whose scope and musical instinct are a testament to their West End background. Sophia Hurdley, in particular, soars through the choreography with an elegance absolutely fitting for Maria Callas – her clearly defined lines and the tragic sweep of her dancing bring true emotion to the singer’s journey. Shelby Williams is cast to perfection as Jackie Kennedy, neat, clear, her serious austerity perfectly contrasting Callas, and James Leece’s nuanced, fascinatingly restrained and awkward Onassis matches them both in acting. The triangle, with R.J. Murrow (Mike Denman) watching over, works dramatic wonders, especially when all three dancers (Callas and the couple) find themselves sharing the stage and mirroring each other. A stunningly expressive work, and a true ode to dramatic dance.

Lîla Dance‘s Here, Still Here, Still was born from a fascinating idea – what happens when you take away from someone his or her usual partners? A woman, Carrie Whitaker, has to work with the memories of these absent presences, and the seamless, dynamic piece that results shows her as a true performer, twisting and stretching her body into odd positions, moving into and away from the floor like a disturbed puppet character. All very well, but Here, Still Here, Still moves too fast to convey a sense of what is missing from the stage – her oddness is linear, almost too well-knit, and I wish her eyes had expressed more of what used to be. This thought-provoking experimentation just lacks a hint of structure and sense of communication to be compelling.

Free me out of existence, choreographed by Denzil Barnes, is an odd version of the battle between good and evil. A man in white goes through a mental combat of sorts with three figures in black lurking in the background, reminiscent of clichéd drug dealers. His struggle quickly takes the form of a MTV video, filled with relentless music in the background and thoroughly repetitive choreography. The good/evil division is far too simplistic – what exactly is it that they’re doing to him? Can it be expressed through choreography? Without those vital elements, the figure in white looks like a martyr in a trance, an entity stuck in its agitation. It is a shame, as the dancers have a natural stage presence, and could do more with the street dance flavour of the work, but strong, well-composed choreography is the necessary evil, and it was missing.

Sol Dans, on the other hand, is a company bursting with ideas, and Melody Squire showed in Groundlings that she is a choreographer to be reckoned with. She was born in Chicago, and it shows, with jazz influences running deep in her vocabulary – Groundlings is American energy as we like it, physical and daring. The six dancers come out as tribal creatures, at once birds and panthers, their wild hair and painted bodies an indication of the form of ritual to come. The choreography hurls them into playful, energetic groups, and is only interrupted by the ribbons of cling film hanging around the stage – giving us the strange, beautiful image of animals suddenly trapped. Watch out for the future choreographic developments of Sol Dans – their escapism is very welcome.

Nexus Dance was billed to perform three solos, but only two made it to the Festival, namely Of Nothing and They Who Have Wings. Unfortunately, short and unrelated pieces are not the best format for a performance, especially without context, and neither registered really strongly. Josh Ben-Tovim is a beautiful dancer, all limbs and angst in Of Nothing, but I’m not sure how this piece differs from the thousands of «emotional» solos performed everywhere. They Who Have Wings was graced with wonderful live music from Tom Kirkpatrick, and his dialogue on stage with dancer and choreographer Siân Hopkins was probably the most interesting side of their work.

Last but not least, Ballet Black made an impromptu appearance, replacing another item. This highly-trained, fascinating company presented Pendulum, a pas de deux choreographed by Martin Lawrance to Steve Reich’s Pendulum Music. Cira Robinson and Jazmon Voss both proved excellent in it, handling the classical virtuoso moves and contemporary partnering with flair, and a physical involvement all the more fascinating to watch from up close. The edgy, powerful competition between them wanes when they come together, yet feeds the tension of the pas de deux. It would be contemporary ballet at its best if Lawrance had selected another composer – Steve Reich’s repetitive noise of a score gives no basis for movement, and a relationship to music would have given even more impulse to the couple. But Ballet Black’s commitment to creation is a rarity in the ballet world, and its dancers are a class act.

So how many festivals actually survive without funding, presenting creations year after year? Cloud Dance Festival has been doing it thrice-yearly since 2007, and proudly introduced its Parade edition in December. Three performances over a weekend featured both favourite artists and newcomers, and although the People Show Studios proved quite small, seeing the performers up close is a privilege often denied in larger venues. The genius of Cloud Dance Festival also lies in its selection of short pieces, some of them works in process – you may not like something, but there are always 7 very different companies to discover, often introducing fresh new works.


Saturday’s performance started with FLEXA Dance Theatre and an intriguing work title, Festival and nagune (wayfarer). Ji Park is adept at using the individuality of her two performers – Aurore Marie’s odd grace and Adrian White’s stillness shine through in the best moments of Festival and nagune, and she literally floats in his arms towards the end, but the work doesn’t quite cohere as a whole. Some elements bear little relation to the rest – the dancers are seen shrieking and running, an Edith Piaf song makes an appearance, and bits of dialogue come and go. The books used as props, first neatly divided into piles, then scattered, provide a compelling image of the performers’ mental landscape, but despite the clever ending, the work does feel at times impenetrable.

Hyanglae Jin’s Life in the womb, on the contrary, is a fully realised organic form, imbued with the strangeness of a Hong Kong film. The fascinatingly alien face of the choreographer and dancer lingers in the mind as she stretches into and retracts from the unknown, breathing with her musician (Revital Snir) – street noises fade in and out like a glimpse of the world outside the womb, heavily reminiscent of Marguerite Duras’s L’Amant and its strangely preserved, sweaty atmosphere. Hyanglae Jin looks like she was just born and yet knows more about this world than any of us do as she stands in the end – an Outsider, utterly magnetic.

Extensions and Rooms, following an interval, is similarly the work of a highly individual performer. Petra Söör is a presence so natural and human on the stage that she never looks like she is performing – a soft, beautiful experience for the audience, and her choreography matches her qualities exactly. Extensions and Rooms is a reflection on the way we make new environments our own, and Petra Söör goes from atmosphere to atmosphere, changing dynamics, moving from the corners to a potentially hostile center. She explores each of them in a low-key, simple manner, but her eyes and light, hesitating hands create the limits of the world better than emphatic choreography, until she leaves the premises, switching off the lights herself.

Leaf Dance’s Papillon is a lesson in not quoting Rainer Maria Rilke in a programme if you’re not making poetry out of your every movement. Leyla Rees, the choreographer, has brought together a very talented group of four performers, but the “butterfly” evoked in the title is not reflected in the movement itself, which is by and large generic. The “exploration of inner hope” doesn’t quite come to life, possibly because the response to the music is still very muted in Rees’ work – more precision, more accents and personality would allow Papillon to go beyond the charming butterfly make-up to a true, individual language.

This part of the evening alone showed the diversity of the festival, with Slanjayvah Danza’s sensual Blind Passion following the very different Extensions and Papillon. Jenni Wren is a master of contact work, and her blindfolded, almost entirely naked duo with Phil Sanger is breathtakingly vulnerable. The blindfolds bring a hesitation to their movements that makes their mutual trust and physical daring all the more fascinating – probably the most entrancing act of seduction and union to be seen in dance at the moment. It is a true shame that the Argentine tango inserted in the first part doesn’t match the rest of the work, despite the apt choice of a Gotan Project slow track – born of improvisation, this dance is very difficult to choreograph, and both dancers need more experience in the style to make it the sinuous, feline, fluid vision that it should be.

A second interval brought us two intense works to close the Saturday evening show. Pair Dance’s RUSH is again a complete change of style, pushing physicality to the fore – exploring the madness and chaos of commuter life, represented by the seats lined up at the back, the work is carried by the sheer energy of its performers and Richard Leonard’s intense soundtrack. The dancers don’t hold back, acting out frustration in an outpouring of movement both drastically accentuated and thoroughly effective, although overall the work could use more contrast. Harriet Macauley’s choreography goes for broke, and the dancers match it all the way, leaving the audience stunned.


Finally, the winner of The Place Prize 2008’s audience prize, Dam Van Huynh, took centre stage to send the audience home with an excerpt from Sudden Change of Event. Certainly one of the most professional offerings in terms of costumes and props, it is an absorbing take on chance and possibilities in choreography, as its randomness never looks chaotic. Disruption, changes of direction – it is a world that leaves one uneasy, all the while unfolding seamlessly. The company’s dancers bring clarity, fluidity and rhythm to the piece, performed in silence, and it would be interesting to see what the full work, premiered in November, makes of this almost austere section.





December 12, 2009

Cloud Interview: Abi Mortimer (Lîla Dance)

Laura @ 02:33 —
Filed under: English,Interviews — Tags: ,

We wrap up our Cloud Interview series with Lîla Dance, a young company with roots in West Sussex. Abi Mortimer and Carrie Whitaker share the credits for the solo they presented at the Cloud Dance Festival, Here, Still Here, Still, and while Carrie was preparing for the performance, Abi kindly discussed the absent presence at the heart of the work, the company’s community projects, and their recent collaboration with outside choreographers.

Can you tell me about your background and Lîla Dance?
It goes back to school – I did GCSE and A-Levels in Dance. I then decided to do a degree, so I went to the University of Chichester, and also completed a Master’s in Choreography. On the back of the Master’s, we formed Lîla Dance – I felt that we had started something in our research, a language, that we hadn’t quite got to grips with yet. Lîla is a Sanskrit word which means “play for no reason”, just for the sake of play. Four of us set up the company, and two of us are now left, as things go in the dance world! Both Carrie [Whitaker] and I work at the University of Chichester, and we’re also an associate company of The Point, a theatre in Eastleigh. They just opened a new creation centre, and we have a “Home from Home” contract with them.
I have personally made four works on Lîla. Well, I direct the works, but the collaboration is between Carrie, me and the dancers – they take care of their movement material, they are very much thinking dancers, as understanding of the language as I am.

What was the thinking behind Here, still here, still?
If I’m honest, it came from losing a dancer. We had to quickly make a quartet into a trio, and we found something quite interesting – that there was a sort of presence of absence left, the feeling that someone who should have been there wasn’t there, a sense that he was still present. That was the beginning seed, although we didn’t think about it until afterwards. It became apparent when we started to make this solo, and we gave Carrie different dance partners, to see what was left when you took the partner away. It was about undergoing a process, we didn’t know before starting what we wanted the solo to look like.
A theatricality came out of it, she often didn’t feel alone – we have moments in it where she says, this is where Abi is. She feels accompanied in her solo. It has a narrative texture, and it’s become for me about a woman who has had a history and now finds herself reflecting on it. We didn’t quite realise how emotional it would be. I think Doug Evans, our composer, really found a distance in the score – and he also came up with words at the end, a line that we felt was right.

What’s next for you after the festival?
At the moment we are in residence for three weeks, working with an Italian choreographer, Simona Bertozzi. This is the first time we have invited choreographers, and we will also have Yael Flexer, formerly from Bedlam Dance, until June. In March we premiere both the piece choreographed by Simona Bertozzi and a re-worked version of Tracker, which we performed at the last Cloud Dance Festival. We will then tour both in our first full-length show. Getting funding for this project was a turning point; we’ve got support from West Sussex County Council, South East Dance, and of course The Point and the University of Chichester. We have been very lucky, and it has made it all possible.

What are your inspirations?
We’ve been very lucky to have had the mentorship of Hofesh Shechter for two years as part of our contract with The Point, and he has been an influence. Siobhan Davies also – I love her treatment of material, her use of narrative without trying to say a story. But for me, it’s the way we work in the studio that has created an identity for our company. It’s interesting now that we’re exploring that with other choreographers and don’t have a complete say, because we do have our way of moving and understanding, and sometimes you want them out of the room! More seriously, I think it will shape and change what we’ve done, and I think we have chosen the right people to let in.
Francis Bacon’s work is another inspiration, because of the way he captures feeling. But mainly my inspirations have come from dance, from play – I think we’re primarily improvisers who shape material into a kind of technique, which always comes from play.

How would you describe your style?
It is not unlike contact improvisation – it features a really dropped use of the pelvis. We also like tu use the floor, to play with the efficiency of going in and out of the floor. But the solo we are doing for the festival is stiller than previous works – we wanted to show more sculpture. Our style is also muscular, athlectic, and very human. It talks about the human condition, in a non-narrative sense.

Any Christmas wishes for your company?
More money, bigger platforms, and apprentices – we have a couple of them and we would love to have the ressources and the money to develop them. Because of the language we use, it’s hard to teach dancers everything we need on a small budget. Apprentices will be an important step forward – we are lucky that we teach 200 people a week between us, we see a lot of young people, a lot of talent. We have a main Lîla’s Youth Company, the MayaKaras, and we create a work with them once a year. There is also a scheme at the Chichester University, where we audition and work with talented people to develop a company. It has become an important feeder for us. And on top of that I am the choreographer for the GCSE’s set study – we are very much involved in the community.

Lîla Dance is a creative associate of The Point, Eastleigh, UK.
Many thanks to Chantal Guevara for making these interviews possible.

Lîla Dance © Mikah Smillie

Lîla Dance at a previous Festival © Mikah Smillie





Powered by WordPress - © L./Bella Figura - Licence Creative Commons.